Publication Ethics

---

The Indian Journal of English Language, Literary Innovation and AI (IJELLIA) aims to uphold the highest standards of publication ethics, academic integrity, research integrity, and transparency. The journal seeks to assess all manuscripts on an impartial and objective basis. Editorial decisions are based on originality, scholarly value, research relevance, methodological soundness, and ethical compliance.

Authors, reviewers, and editors are expected to maintain ethical standards throughout manuscript submission, peer review, publication, and post-publication activities. Particular attention is given to responsible research practices, accurate interpretation of findings, appropriate acknowledgement of sources, and transparency regarding the use of artificial intelligence and digital research tools.

Responsibilities of Authors

---

Authors are expected to:

• Submit original and unpublished research manuscripts.
• Ensure that manuscripts are not simultaneously submitted to another journal.
• Present research results accurately, objectively, and without misrepresentation.
• Properly acknowledge, reference, and quote all sources used in the manuscript.
• Avoid plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and the unauthorized use of previously published materials.
• Obtain the necessary permissions for copyrighted literary works, figures, tables, images, datasets, and other materials, where applicable.
• Ensure that all listed authors have made sufficient contributions to the research.
• Disclose any potential conflicts of interest.
• Acknowledge sources of funding and other forms of research support.
• Accurately describe research methods, linguistic analyses, literary interpretations, computational procedures, and analytical processes.
• Disclose the use of artificial intelligence tools, language models, or automated systems in accordance with the journal's policies.
• Ensure that AI-assisted content is carefully reviewed, verified, critically assessed, and appropriately identified where required.
• Maintain the accuracy, originality, and integrity of submitted manuscripts.
• Inform the journal promptly of significant errors or inaccuracies discovered after publication.

Responsibilities of Reviewers

---

Reviewers are expected to:

• Conduct fair, unbiased, and objective manuscript evaluations.
• Maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and all information related to the review process.
• Provide constructive comments and recommendations relevant to the academic quality of the manuscript.
• Evaluate the originality, scholarly contribution, research quality, methodology, and academic significance of submitted work.
• Critically assess research findings, interpretations, and analytical procedures.
• Evaluate the use of AI tools and related technologies where applicable, with attention to ethical and responsible research practices.
• Identify relevant published research that has not been appropriately acknowledged or cited.
• Avoid conflicts of interest when accepting or conducting manuscript reviews.
• Complete manuscript reviews within the specified timeframe.
• Inform the editor of suspected research misconduct or ethical concerns.
• Refrain from using unpublished manuscript materials for personal, professional, or academic benefit.
• Avoid uploading, copying, or sharing confidential manuscripts with external AI tools or platforms without appropriate permissions and confidentiality safeguards.

Responsibilities of Editors

---

Editors are expected to:

• Make editorial decisions objectively, fairly, and without bias.
• Maintain confidentiality concerning submitted manuscripts and editorial communications.
• Select appropriately qualified reviewers with relevant subject expertise.
• Ensure that editorial decisions and communications are accurate, clear, and professional.
• Respond appropriately to ethical concerns, research integrity complaints, and suspected misconduct.
• Maintain the scholarly integrity and academic quality of published research.
• Follow fair, transparent, and responsible editorial practices.
• Identify, disclose, and appropriately manage conflicts of interest in editorial work and peer review.
• Evaluate manuscripts according to scholarly merit, originality, and research integrity rather than the author's background, institutional affiliation, or professional standing.
• Ensure appropriate disclosure of AI tool use in research submissions, in accordance with journal policies.
• Maintain consistency, fairness, and transparency throughout the editorial process.

Academic Honesty & Research Misconduct

---

IJELLIA does not tolerate unethical research or publication practices. All submitted manuscripts are expected to represent original scholarly work, acknowledge the contributions of others appropriately, and comply with responsible academic research and publication standards.

The following practices are considered unacceptable:

• Plagiarism and self-plagiarism.
• Duplicate, redundant, or multiple publication of substantially the same research.
• Fabrication or falsification of research data.
• Misrepresentation or manipulation of textual, linguistic, literary, visual, computational, or other research evidence.
• Failure to disclose or inappropriate use of AI-generated content.
• Presenting AI-generated content as entirely human-created work when disclosure is required.
• Misrepresenting AI-generated analyses, literary interpretations, or computational conclusions as independently verified research findings.
• Simultaneous submission of the same manuscript to multiple journals.
• Incorrect attribution of authorship or misrepresentation of author contributions.
• Citation manipulation or inappropriate referencing practices.
• Failure to disclose or appropriately manage conflicts of interest.
• Misrepresentation of research methods, sources, or academic findings.
• Unauthorized reproduction or use of copyrighted literary works, translations, or other protected materials.
• Failure to report relevant research permissions or ethical approvals, where applicable.
• Other forms of research or publication misconduct.

Actions Against Research Misconduct

---

Where unethical research or publication practices are suspected, IJELLIA may request clarification, seek additional information, reject a manuscript, or initiate appropriate editorial action. The response will depend on the nature, seriousness, and circumstances of the issue.

For previously published articles, appropriate actions may include issuing a correction, publishing an expression of concern, or retracting an article when necessary, depending on the nature and severity of the identified problem.